Customer
Posted
Great customer service all my questions…
Great customer service all my questions were answered promptly and efficiently! Thank you!

Excellent
430 reviews
Slash is listed under Internet & Software in San Francisco, California.
Slash (slash.com) has 430 customer reviews on Consumer Courier, with an average rating of 4.7 out of 5.
430 approved reviews, newest moderated first
Customer
Posted
Great customer service all my questions were answered promptly and efficiently! Thank you!
لمى و.
Posted
انكم مثلي الاعلى في الحياة عنجد انكم مثال الثقة والأمانة والتفاني في العمل من اجل تطوير العالم باكمله
Support S.
Posted
The team was very responsive to our inquiry and responded in a timely fashio.
Iriba Enterprises I.
Posted
I am very disappointed with Slash Banking. My accounts were closed even though I had zero transactions and had not actively used them, yet they were deemed a “risk” without explanation. If there were any issues with my business or documentation, I do not understand why my account was approved initially. I had linked this account to my online marketplaces, and now it has been closed suddenly, without any clear reason or policy reference. The lack of transparency and communication has been very frustrating. Based on this experience, I would not recommend Slash to other small business owners, especially those just starting out. I hope Slash improves its customer support and clearly communicates policies to avoid situations like this.
dylan
Posted
Slash is the best thing I have ever used
Axel
Posted
I love Slash. It allows me to manage money flows without risking a block as we often see with the competitors. It's convenient for my marketing agency to receive all Stripe payouts on the 1th, without wondering if the bank account will freeze a whole month of revenue.
RIVOLT L.
Posted
SIGNUP IS VERY EASY WITH PROPER DOCUMENTS AND SLASH GIVES MORE OFFERS THEN OTHERS AND NO VERY STRICT
Phil
Posted
My company has been using Slash’s services for some time. We encountered issues with several transactions and initiated disputes by following Slash’s documented process on their website. After the disputes were opened and VISA investigations began, Slash emailed us requesting additional information to support the cases. We gathered the requested documentation and uploaded it through Slash’s online portal prior to the stated deadline, as instructed. Some time later, we received notification that the disputes were denied. The reason given was that the requested information had not been provided in time, and the investigations could not be completed. Because all documentation was submitted through Slash’s portal, we had no independent confirmation or record showing that the uploads were received or transmitted. When we contacted a Slash representative for clarification, we were told there were no records of the submissions and that no further action could be taken. As a result, the disputes were closed without consideration of the materials we had provided.